Confusion on alternatives for /usr/lib/xorg/modules/linux/libglx.so

[Hualet Wang]

On 7/18/18 4:56 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2018-07-16 07:17, Hualet Wang wrote:
>> Thanks for your explanation, Andreas. But I still get further questions
>> here:
>> On 7/16/18 4:26 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> On 2018-07-15 09:00, Hualet Wang wrote:
>>>> Recently I’m trying port nvidia-prime to our distribution,
>>> We might be interested in the result of that project.
>>> https://bugs.debian.org/875959
>> The progress seems to be very slow?
> Rather: noone is working on it.
>
>>> This should be fixed wth 390.67-2.
>> We're now on 390.59-2, but we seem to still get this problem, I'll dig
>> into it.
> That is not the fixed version ...
Sorry, my mistake.
>
>> I'm wondering which part of code or scripts doing this "manual" work?
>> So I can try to debug the problem on my own :)
> See commit d68ecb1bd90c5838bbbfe096e51bcebc09753621
> "Manual" as in "we now have to set a value that was previously the default".
>
>
> Andreas

Sure, thank you.