[Pkg-openldap-devel] r865 - in openldap/trunk-2.3/debian: . po

Steve Langasek vorlon at debian.org
Sun Nov 25 07:33:23 UTC 2007


On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 02:40:42PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 02:34:53PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > For the pkg-samba-maint list, I have the following rules in privacy options
> > -> sender filters -> accept_these_nonmembers which I think would save you
> > time and make the list more usable for the rest of us too:

> >   ^[A-Za-z0-9.-]+ at alioth\.debian\.org
> >   installer at ftp-master\.debian\.org
> >   dak at ftp-master\.debian\.org
> >   owner at bugs.debian.org

> ... of course, that doesn't handle the BTS mail, does it.  The whitelisting
> of BTS mail is done under "spam filters", but the tradeoff is that you have
> to list the email addresses of all the list subscribers too, because the
> spam filters take precedence over the whitelisting. :/

But what it really required was for me to look at the question with fresh
eyes. :)

Here then are the spam filtering rules on the pkg-samba-maint list, which
permit whitelisting of all subscriber, BTS, archive, and alioth mail:

Privacy options -> Spam filters -> Spam Filter Rule 1 (accept):

 ^X-Debian-PR-Source: samba  (<-- obviously change this source package name)
 ^X-Debian-PR-Message: transcript$

Privacy options -> Spam filters -> Spam Filter Rule 2 (defer):

 .

Privacy options -> Sender filters -> generic_nonmember_action: hold
Privacy options -> Sender filters -> accept_these_nonmembers:

 ^[A-Za-z0-9.-]+ at alioth\.debian\.org
 installer at ftp-master.debian.org
 dak at ftp-master.debian.org
 owner at bugs.debian.org
 bts-link-upstream at lists.alioth.debian.org
 noreply at henning.makholm.net

General Options -> respond_to_post_requests: no

Matthijs, I would be happy if you would give these settings a try and see
whether they work for you.  If they do, I'll publicize them more in my blog
and see if there's a way that we could make these defaults on alioth;
sensible spam filtering on alioth had eluded me for the longest time, and
I'm excited by the prospect that we might be able to finally recommend a
good solution that spares developers from getting all those annoying
auto-responses when trying to communicate with maintainers. :)

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon at debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/



More information about the Pkg-openldap-devel mailing list