[Pkg-openldap-devel] r865 - in openldap/trunk-2.3/debian: . po

[Matthijs Mohlmann]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 02:40:42PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 02:34:53PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> For the pkg-samba-maint list, I have the following rules in privacy options
>>> -> sender filters -> accept_these_nonmembers which I think would save you
>>> time and make the list more usable for the rest of us too:
> 
>>>   ^[A-Za-z0-9.-]+ at alioth\.debian\.org
>>>   installer at ftp-master\.debian\.org
>>>   dak at ftp-master\.debian\.org
>>>   owner at bugs.debian.org
> 
>> ... of course, that doesn't handle the BTS mail, does it.  The whitelisting
>> of BTS mail is done under "spam filters", but the tradeoff is that you have
>> to list the email addresses of all the list subscribers too, because the
>> spam filters take precedence over the whitelisting. :/
> 
> But what it really required was for me to look at the question with fresh
> eyes. :)
> 
> Here then are the spam filtering rules on the pkg-samba-maint list, which
> permit whitelisting of all subscriber, BTS, archive, and alioth mail:
> 
> Privacy options -> Spam filters -> Spam Filter Rule 1 (accept):
> 
>  ^X-Debian-PR-Source: samba  (<-- obviously change this source package name)
>  ^X-Debian-PR-Message: transcript$
> 
> Privacy options -> Spam filters -> Spam Filter Rule 2 (defer):
> 
>  .
> 
> Privacy options -> Sender filters -> generic_nonmember_action: hold
> Privacy options -> Sender filters -> accept_these_nonmembers:
> 
>  ^[A-Za-z0-9.-]+ at alioth\.debian\.org
>  installer at ftp-master.debian.org
>  dak at ftp-master.debian.org
>  owner at bugs.debian.org
>  bts-link-upstream at lists.alioth.debian.org
>  noreply at henning.makholm.net
> 
> General Options -> respond_to_post_requests: no
> 
> Matthijs, I would be happy if you would give these settings a try and see
> whether they work for you.  If they do, I'll publicize them more in my blog
> and see if there's a way that we could make these defaults on alioth;
> sensible spam filtering on alioth had eluded me for the longest time, and
> I'm excited by the prospect that we might be able to finally recommend a
> good solution that spares developers from getting all those annoying
> auto-responses when trying to communicate with maintainers. :)
> 

Applied these changes, lets see what happens. :)

Regards,

Matthijs Mohlmann
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHSUrM2n1ROIkXqbARAqMwAJ97XarNt5RVWjHSFNLfLfcdqxv6hgCeK8l1
oUJ1vZl/qBLRs7OWM4jX5Ys=
=GtCW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----