[Pkg-pascal-devel] lazarus binary package doesn't depend on lcl?

Abou Al Montacir abou.almontacir at sfr.fr
Sun Nov 20 16:28:40 UTC 2016

Hi Paul,
On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 18:19 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi all,
> Oh, and another great old e-mail...
> On 03-06-16 22:04, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > Once you have lcl-src, then no need for the rest of the files. The IDE
> > > sources are not useful for users. Only LCL source are.
> > > So in that sense lcl-src will replace lazarus-src while removing non
> > > useful files.
> > 
> > Let's do that then with the next upstream version (as we need to go
> > through NEW at that moment anyways).
> So, if we go with the 1.6 suffix, we could do this now, but any moment 
> is nearly equql. If we go for the 1.6.2 suffix, I think now is a good 
> moment to do it. Which part isn't needed anymore, only ./ide, or more?. 
> test and tools source probably also doesn't need shipping. I also just 
> see that we probably should install the examples elsewhere.
As I said in previous mail I'm in favor of going with 1.6.2, but will not object
1.6 though. I think better revert to old way of putting everything with 3
numbers version. This will be easier to support in my sense.
Abou Al Montacir

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20161120/241751d1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20161120/241751d1/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pkg-pascal-devel mailing list