[Dehs-devel] libxml-sax-perl: New upstream version available
Raphael Geissert
atomo64 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 2 19:15:59 UTC 2008
On 02/03/2008, Martín Ferrari <martin.ferrari at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Niko Tyni <ntyni at debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, that makes sense. Thanks. I'll switch to dversionmangle in the future.
>
>
> I don't think this is correct.Firstly, DEHS is doing the wrong thing
> by removing dsfg and therefore assuming things that uscan don't. Also,
> I see the uversionmangle as correct because when downloading the
> repack script takes care of making it dfsg-free.
IMHO the repack script should then rename it to +dfsg
> Also it makes life
> easier to everybody, because if we used the dversionmangle the
> svn-inject script will use incorrect versions for the
> branches/upstream tags.
How's that? that seems like a broken behaviour of svn-inject
> I would really prefer to keep our current
> practise; DEHS can easily not strip dfsg (and understand that some
> maintainers have a clue :)), or strip it also in the upstream version.
I plan to go the former way after version=4 watch files are accepted
on uscan, which will by default strip dfsg and similar Debian
repackaging signs via dversionmangle.
>
> --
>
> Martín Ferrari
>
Sincerely,
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Say NO to Microsoft Office broken standard.
See http://www.noooxml.org/petition
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list