Bug#687211: IPv6 recommends should be the preferred alternative

gregor herrmann gregoa at debian.org
Tue Sep 11 16:30:23 UTC 2012


On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:53:41 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:

> the alternatives for the build dependencies default to the ipv6 variants, while
> the recommends default to ipv4.  this looks inconsistent. should the recommends
> default to ipv6 too?

I guess (there are several alternatives with ipv6 involved) that
refers to:

Build-Depends-Indep: libio-socket-inet6-perl | libio-socket-ip-perl (>= 0.11), 
Recommends: libio-socket-ip-perl (>= 0.11) | libio-socket-inet6-perl,

In my understanding, libio-socket-ip-perl is newer, preferred by
upstream, and supports both IPv4 and IPv6. So the Recommends makes
more sense to me than the B-D-I.

Not sure about the difference between build and runtime deps; those
lines changed several lines in the recent git historiy :)

Salvatore, do you still remember the reason for c622141?

| Interchange build-dependency for libio-socket-inet6-perl
|
| -Build-Depends-Indep: libio-socket-ip-perl (>= 0.11) | libio-socket-inet6-perl,
| +Build-Depends-Indep: libio-socket-inet6-perl | libio-socket-ip-perl (>= 0.11),


Ah, I think libio-socket-ip-perl was too old (i.e. 0.11 not yet
uploaded) at the time of the change?


Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Lenny Kravitz: Can't Get You Off My Mind
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-perl-maintainers/attachments/20120911/3d6724d2/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers mailing list