Bug#732570: libarch-perl should be removed

[Axel Beckert]

Hi,

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: libarch-perl
> Version: 0.5.2-1
> Severity: normal
> 
> GNU arch is dead since 2006, and I seriously doubt that anyone is still
> using libarch-perl.

Popcon is steadily descreasing in the past 5 years, but there are a
few "votes", so there are definitely people using the package actively:
http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=libarch-perl

The reasoning seems nevertheless comprehensible -- at least from the
point of someone who never used tla.

I though have to point out that there are no other open bug reports
against libarch-perl and there were no bug reports in the past year
either: http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/liba/libarch-perl.png

So I think it should probably stay until tla itself is about to be
removed as it does no harm if it stays.

		Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe at debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
  `-    |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5