Bug#732570: libarch-perl should be removed
Axel Beckert
abe at debian.org
Fri Dec 20 13:27:33 UTC 2013
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Package: libarch-perl
[...]
> > GNU arch is dead since 2006, and I seriously doubt that anyone is still
> > using libarch-perl.
>
> Popcon is steadily descreasing in the past 5 years, but there are a
> few "votes", so there are definitely people using the package actively:
> http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=libarch-perl
Despite I had the feeling that GNU Arch is dead, too, popcon of the
tla shows a more or less constantly increasing graph of installations:
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=tla
So it looks rather undead on a first glance. But the "votes" seem
constant over the years:
http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=tla
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe at debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
More information about the pkg-perl-maintainers
mailing list