[Pkg-puppet-devel] Fwd: Do we need different debian/ubuntu maintainer groups?

[micah anderson]

On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:27:44 -0400, Mathias Gug <mathiaz at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> For now the workflow is to push all the Ubuntu changes in the Debian bug
> tracker (I've just updated existing bugs and filed new ones for all the changes
> that the Ubuntu package carried in Lucid). I've based all the patches on the
> Debian git repository and thus they should apply cleanly. It's now up to
> someone that has commit access to the git repository on the Debian side to
> review, discuss and apply the patches.
> 
> One proposal is to give commit access to the Debian git repository to an Ubuntu
> developer so that most of the packaging work can be directly committed to
> Debian without having to go through the Debian BTS. If this seems unreasonable
> we can stick with the current process of filling bugs in BTS and waiting for
> someone on the Debian side to perform the patch review.

I would be fine with giving Ubuntu developers git commit access to the
repository. We are trying to do code review for every commit, so the
review is there be it via a patch or a git commit. The only difference
is the patch introduces a lot of overhead on all sides. 

micah
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-puppet-devel/attachments/20100604/b75f358e/attachment.pgp>