[Pkg-puppet-devel] Fwd: Do we need different debian/ubuntu maintainer groups?

[Nigel Kersten]

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:25 AM, micah anderson <micah at riseup.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 17:27:44 -0400, Mathias Gug <mathiaz at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
>> For now the workflow is to push all the Ubuntu changes in the Debian bug
>> tracker (I've just updated existing bugs and filed new ones for all the changes
>> that the Ubuntu package carried in Lucid). I've based all the patches on the
>> Debian git repository and thus they should apply cleanly. It's now up to
>> someone that has commit access to the git repository on the Debian side to
>> review, discuss and apply the patches.
>>
>> One proposal is to give commit access to the Debian git repository to an Ubuntu
>> developer so that most of the packaging work can be directly committed to
>> Debian without having to go through the Debian BTS. If this seems unreasonable
>> we can stick with the current process of filling bugs in BTS and waiting for
>> someone on the Debian side to perform the patch review.
>
> I would be fine with giving Ubuntu developers git commit access to the
> repository. We are trying to do code review for every commit, so the
> review is there be it via a patch or a git commit. The only difference
> is the patch introduces a lot of overhead on all sides.

I'm fine with that access too.