[Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers] Common Position on RubyGems
Esteban Manchado Velázquez
zoso at foton.es
Thu Nov 3 09:23:32 UTC 2005
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 08:18:39AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> [...]
> > "Some RubyGems developers have been (quite) difficult to deal with, and seem
> > to have some griefs against Debian and GNU/Linux in general. They seem to not
> > be willing to make changes to RubyGems to make it easier to convert gems to
> > Debian or RPM packages. This is harming the communication between Debian and
> > the RubyGems developers as a whole, as well as between both systems."
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> Ok, but is "This is harming[...] both systems." really necessary ? This
> seems also quite rude to me.
OK, I wrote it as an explanation why the bullet was appropriate, but let's
drop it. Or perhaps we can write something like: "This makes interoperation
between both systems harder.".
--
Esteban Manchado Velázquez <zoso at foton.es> - http://www.foton.es
EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20051103/b3c5fe40/attachment.pgp
More information about the pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
mailing list