[DRE-maint] getting rid of packages-wip/ in our SVN repository

[gregor herrmann]

On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:55:58 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:

> > I don't fully understand what you propose. What would be the logic
> > that PET should gain? If I read correctly the packages-wip directory
> > is used for packages that under PET are shown as WIP anyways... So
> > getting rid of it sounds sensible to me
> There is an important distinction, IMHO, between what PET sees as
> "work in progress" and what we (pkg-ruby-extras) see as -wip: The
> later means they are packages which do not affect Debian's QA, as they
> have not yet been uploaded for the first time. So they could IMHO be
> added as a "first upload pending" category,

Nice idea. On the pkg-perl PET page there are quite a few "forgotten"
never-uploaded package buried in the 111 WIP packages.

Cheers,
gregor 
-- 
 .''`.   Home: http://info.comodo.priv.at/{,blog/} / GPG Key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux User, Admin, & Developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., Fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/
   `-    NP: Will Oldham: You have cum in your hair and your dick is hanging out
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20080915/d1367e7f/attachment.pgp