[DRE-maint] RFS: libglobalhotkeys-ruby

[Lucas Nussbaum]

On 04/08/10 at 20:24 +0200, vincent carmona wrote:
> 2010/8/4 vincent carmona <vinc4mai at gmail.com>:
> > 2010/8/4, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net>:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Quick review:
> >> - use english for commit messages :-)
> >> - changelog: UNRELEASED -> unstable
> >> - you should have a libglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8 that contains the actual
> >>   files, as well as a libglobalhotkeys-ruby package that simply depends
> >>   on libglobalhotkeys-ruby (see the other packages in the repo)
> >> - no '.' at end of Description's first line.
> >> - use sentences in long description.
> >> - in rules, use the cdbs classes provided by the team, not the default
> >>   debhelper template (see other packages)
> >> - your library is loaded using require 'rghk', so I think that it makes
> >>   more sense to name the package librghk-ruby.
> >>
> >>> I still have two lintian infos :
> >>> description-synopsis-might-not-be-phrased-properly
> >>> possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration
> >>>
> >>> Do you think I should rephrase the description or use doc-base ?
> >>
> >> Yes, probably both.
> >> --
> >> | Lucas Nussbaum
> >> | lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
> >> | jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
> >>
> >
> > Hi Lucas.
> >
> > Thanks for your review.
> > I will take a look at cdbs and doc-base which I do not know.
> > I will let you know when I have done taking acount of your remarks.
> >
> > Sorry for the french commit message :(. I had to be sleepy when I made it.
> >
> > Vincent Carmona
> >
> 
> Hi.
> 
> I now use cdbs. I provide libglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8 and libglobalhotkeys-ruby.
> 
> If I rename the package librghk, do I need to commit my change under
> libglobalhotkeys directories or use svn-inject to create a new
> directory ? Then how I delete the old one ?

you could just svn mv it. That should work.

> libglobalhotkeys-ruby seems more  understandable than librghk-ruby.

That's a problem that you should probably address as the upstream author
;)

> As for doc-base, the package does not install "online" documentation,
> only the rdoc html file and a ruby example. Should I use doc-base ?

Yes, I think so.
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |