[DRE-maint] RFS: libglobalhotkeys-ruby

Lucas Nussbaum lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net
Thu Aug 5 15:22:49 UTC 2010


On 05/08/10 at 17:14 +0200, vincent carmona wrote:
> 2010/8/5 Lucas Nussbaum <lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net>:
> > On 05/08/10 at 16:26 +0200, vincent carmona wrote:
> >> 2010/8/5 Lucas Nussbaum <lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net>:
> >> >> libglobalhotkeys-ruby seems more  understandable than librghk-ruby.
> >> >
> >> > That's a problem that you should probably address as the upstream author
> >> > ;)
> >>
> >> I think I will change the require call for require 'globalhotkeys' in
> >> the next upstream release. Can I stay with libglobalhotkeys-ruby for
> >> now ?
> >
> > If you are sure that you will do it, then yes.
> 
> I will.
> 
> >> >> As for doc-base, the package does not install "online" documentation,
> >> >> only the rdoc html file and a ruby example. Should I use doc-base ?
> >> >
> >> > Yes, I think so.
> >>
> >> I gonna take a look at at a project that use doc-base.
> >
> > Isn't it used by other pkg-ruby-extras packages?
> 
> It  seems that is  use by 13  pkg-ruby-extras projects.
> After taking a look at one I have update svn repo with a doc-base
> file. I hope I do it the right way.
> 
> The last problems I see in the package are shlibdeps warnings at building time :
> dh_shlibdeps -plibglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libdl.so.2 could be avoided if
> "debian/libglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/rghk.so"
> were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libm.so.6 could be avoided if
> "debian/libglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/rghk.so"
> were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librt.so.1 could be avoided if
> "debian/libglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/rghk.so"
> were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpthread.so.0 could be
> avoided if "debian/libglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/rghk.so"
> were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libcrypt.so.1 could be avoided
> if "debian/libglobalhotkeys-ruby1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/rghk.so"
> were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
> 
> I think it is due to the extconf.rb magic. Should I get rid off these
> warnings ? How ?

No, please ignore them for now. All ruby-extras packages have the same
problem.

So, should I sponsor your package, or do you have other TODO items?
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas at lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas at nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list