[DRE-maint] ruby-pg-query_1.3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Pirate Praveen]

On 2021, മാർച്ച് 21 2:30:08 AM IST, Sean Whitton <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
>
>+----------------------+
>|   REJECT reasoning   |
>+----------------------+
>
>At least the following files have different copyright holders/licenses:
>src_port_qsort.c contrib_pgcrypto_sha1.c sha1.h src_port_erand48.c

I have fixed the copyright notices in git and will upload once I can find an answer to the comment below.

>+----------------------+
>|    Other comments    |
>+----------------------+
>
>A huge amount of uncompiled source code is installed into /usr/lib;
>shouldn't it be in /usr/share, and installed arch:all?

These are used during build. Its upstream build system downloads these sources during build. I have patched its build system to use the sources provided as extra tarball. I had to include these files in list of files in gemspec for the build to find these files. I will need help from ruby team to exclude these in the binary package.

At least right now, the default is to include all files belonging to a gem in a single directory, either arch specific directory or arch independent directory. I don't think we can mix directories for same gem.

Ruby team, any ideas on the best method here? If we don't add it to gemspec's list of files, it won't build and if we remove the files in deb, we will have a broken gemspec file.

>+----------------------+
>|         N.B.         |
>+----------------------+
>
>This review may not be exhaustive.  Please check your source package
>against your d/copyright and the ftpmaster REJECT-FAQ, throughly,
>before uploading to NEW again.
>
>Thank you for your time and contribution!
>
>Sean
>
>
>
>===
>
>Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
>your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
>concerns.
>

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.