[DRE-maint] ruby-uc.micro-rb_1.0.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

VIVEK K J vivekkj at protonmail.com
Wed Oct 6 07:18:08 BST 2021


Hi,

    Thank you for pointing the issue. They've using WTFPL license in the gemspec file. But in their source code (i.e. GitHub Repository) they are using license text of expat[1] and they updated their gemspec file to use MIT expat license[2] in master branch. That's why I gave the license as expat.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Tuesday, October 5th, 2021 at 11:30 PM, Thorsten Alteholz <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> according to uc.micro-rb.gemspec the license is WTFPL. Where did you get the information about the Expat license?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Thorsten
>
>
> ===========================================================================================================================================
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
>
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
>
> concerns.


[1] - https://github.com/digitalmoksha/uc.micro-rb/blob/v1.0.5/LICENSE
[2] - https://github.com/digitalmoksha/uc.micro-rb/blob/master/uc.micro-rb.gemspec#L11


Thanks,

Vivek K J



More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list