[DRE-maint] ruby-uc.micro-rb_1.0.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Pirate Praveen]

On 6/10/21 11:48 AM, VIVEK K J wrote:
> Hi,
>
>     Thank you for pointing the issue. They've using WTFPL license in the gemspec file. But in their source code (i.e. GitHub Repository) they are using license text of expat[1] and they updated their gemspec file to use MIT expat license[2] in master branch. That's why I gave the license as expat.
Can you make it "WTFPL and Expat" then? and add a Comment saying Expat
is mentioned in the upstream git repo.
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>
> On Tuesday, October 5th, 2021 at 11:30 PM, Thorsten Alteholz <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> according to uc.micro-rb.gemspec the license is WTFPL. Where did you get the information about the Expat license?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Thorsten
>>
>>
>> ===========================================================================================================================================
>>
>> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
>>
>> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
>>
>> concerns.
>
> [1] - https://github.com/digitalmoksha/uc.micro-rb/blob/v1.0.5/LICENSE
> [2] - https://github.com/digitalmoksha/uc.micro-rb/blob/master/uc.micro-rb.gemspec#L11
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vivek K J

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers/attachments/20211006/e8c9948e/attachment-0001.sig>