[DRE-maint] ruby-uc.micro-rb_1.0.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

VIVEK K J vivekkj at protonmail.com
Thu Oct 7 12:06:08 BST 2021


-‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Wednesday, October 6th, 2021 at 10:32 PM, Pirate Praveen <praveen at onenetbeyond.org> wrote:

> On 6/10/21 11:48 AM, VIVEK K J wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >     Thank you for pointing the issue. They've using WTFPL license in the gemspec file. But in their source code (i.e. GitHub Repository) they are using license text of expat[1] and they updated their gemspec file to use MIT expat license[2] in master branch. That's why I gave the license as expat.
> >
>
> Can you make it "WTFPL and Expat" then? and add a Comment saying Expat
Done.

Changed Files:
        debian/copyright
> is mentioned in the upstream git repo.
>
> > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 5th, 2021 at 11:30 PM, Thorsten Alteholz ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > according to uc.micro-rb.gemspec the license is WTFPL. Where did you get the information about the Expat license?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Thorsten
> > >
> > > ===========================================================================================================================================
> > >
> > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> > >
> > > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> > >
> > > concerns.
> >
> > [1] - https://github.com/digitalmoksha/uc.micro-rb/blob/v1.0.5/LICENSE
> >
> > [2] - https://github.com/digitalmoksha/uc.micro-rb/blob/master/uc.micro-rb.gemspec#L11
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Vivek K J



More information about the Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list