tdb* in samba or tdb-tools [was: Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] r813 - trunk]

[Noèl Köthe]

Am Sonntag, den 25.12.2005, 14:18 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:

Hello,

> > added tdbdump and tdbtool to samba package
> 
> Would it be better to keep this as a separate tdb-tools package rather than
> pulling it into samba itself?  It might be a cleaner upgrade path.  If we
> think samba should depend on tdb-tools, that would be fine.

I thought it doesn't make much sense if it is developed by upstream
samba and then pulled out into tdb-tools. Then it will cause the
"problem" like now that the tdb-tools is outdated:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/2005-December/000159.html

Thats why I preferred it this way but its just IMHO and if you think
keeping it in tdb-tools is better then I revert this change.

CC: Marek Habersack the tdb-tools maintainer.

-- 
Noèl Köthe <noel debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20051226/d36ed6fd/attachment.pgp