tdb* in samba or tdb-tools [was: Re: [Pkg-samba-maint] r813 - trunk]

[Steve Langasek]

On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:32:11AM +0100, Noèl Köthe wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 25.12.2005, 14:18 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:

> Hello,

> > > added tdbdump and tdbtool to samba package

> > Would it be better to keep this as a separate tdb-tools package rather than
> > pulling it into samba itself?  It might be a cleaner upgrade path.  If we
> > think samba should depend on tdb-tools, that would be fine.

> I thought it doesn't make much sense if it is developed by upstream
> samba and then pulled out into tdb-tools. Then it will cause the
> "problem" like now that the tdb-tools is outdated:
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/2005-December/000159.html

> Thats why I preferred it this way but its just IMHO and if you think
> keeping it in tdb-tools is better then I revert this change.

No, I'm asking whether tdb-tools should be built from the samba sources as a
separate binary package.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon at debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20051225/b9dbe951/attachment.pgp