[Pkg-samba-maint] Anyone feeling like digging into the patches and see whether we still need them?

[Jelmer Vernooij]

On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 10:02 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:02:07PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Also inserting comments like the ones we use in the shadow package
> > maintenance would be good:
> 
> > Goal: allow non numerical group identifier to be specified with useradd's
> >       and usermod's -g options
> 
> > Fixes: #381394, #381399, #381404, #381408, #381448
> 
> > Status wrt upstream: Applied in CVS
> 
> Sure, no objections to that, but perhaps the first priority should be to get
> any appropriate patches *sent* upstream so they can be dropped altogether?
> :)  The make-distclean patch, for instance, should almost certainly be
> included upstream.
I've just committed the following patches upstream (and updated the status in SVN):

make-distclean.patch
non-linux-ports.patch
python-examples.patch

These patches will all be part of 3.0.26 (due out in 4 or 5 months?)

Jelmer
-- 
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at samba.org> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20070429/4eb3681c/attachment.pgp