[Pkg-samba-maint] talloc_2.0.8-0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Ivo De Decker (ivo.dedecker at ugent.be):

> > Let's hope we won't have to do an update targeted at wheezy as it
> > means we'll have to go through tpu.
> 
> Well, maybe it's better to re-upload the old version with an epoch. It seems
> the shlibs file should make sure that a samba version built against such a
> 'newer' epoched talloc should not get a stricter dependency, so that it could
> migrate to wheezy without issues (if unblocked).

I'm not keen at introducing an epoch for this, indeed.


> This would probably also allow newer samba 3.6 versions built in experimental
> (without explicit dependencies on the newer talloc, which is used by samba4
> only) to be installed on wheezy unchanged.
> 
> BTW speaking of samba 3.6, are you planning to upload samba 3.6.12 to
> experimental, or should I look into that?

Hmmm, totally forgot about that. As I'm focused on samba4 right now,
you can work on it, yes, would be nice to have.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20130216/482e4b38/attachment.pgp>