[Pkg-samba-maint] ldb so bump?

Mathieu Parent math.parent at gmail.com
Mon Sep 16 19:00:47 BST 2019


Le lundi 16 septembre 2019, Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton at debian.org> a écrit :
> On 16.9.2019 11.20, Mathieu Parent wrote:
>> Le lun. 16 sept. 2019 à 08:38, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> a
écrit :
>>>
>>> On Sun, 2019-09-15 at 18:12 +0200, Mathieu Parent wrote:
>>>> Hello Andrew,
>>>>
>>>> I'm preparing samba 4.11 debian package including ldb 2.0.7.
>>>>
>>>> I'm wondering: Does this needs a so bump (libldb2)? the commit is:
>>>>
>>>> commit 15d1ecdca6a4fbceddefd7ef4b8a9b912c067207
>>>> Author: Aaron Haslett <aaronhaslett at catalyst.net.nz>
>>>> Date:   Wed Mar 20 13:52:16 2019 +1300
>>>>
>>>>     ldb: version 2.0.0
>>>>
>>>>     * Version bump for adding index_format_fn to the schema syntax
>>>> structure.
>>>>     * Range index support added, allowing <= and >= operations to be
>>>> indexed
>>>>     * Improved reindex performance by setting the in-memory TDB hash
>>>> size correctly
>>>>
>>>>     Signed-off-by: Aaron Haslett <aaronhaslett at catalyst.net.nz>
>>>>     Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>
>>>>     Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming at catalyst.net.nz>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> ldb bumps SO with the package version.  I tried to split this up but
>>> wasn't successful.
>>>
>>> Furthermore, a strict reading of the ABI rules meant that a change in
>>> the public structure, even when we know that nobody other than Samba
>>> uses it, means we have to bump the SO version.
>>
>> sssd builds against libldb-dev. I don't know if they are impacted by
>> the schema change, but at least they will be impacted by the so bump.
>>
>> CC-ing them.
>>
>>>
>>> Finally, and tangentially related, I would strongly recommend just
>>> building ldb from the samba tarball, and not paying any attention to
>>> the distinct ldb tarbals.  If you need me to prepare a patch to do this
>>> as part of the main build I can to that for you, but I'm hoping you can
>>> just install it during the build.
>>
>> SSSd team, any comments on this?
>
> Fine by me, assuming there's still going to be a libldb-dev so that sssd
> builds.

Yes. Currenty (NEW to experimental) it is. And we'll ensure to keep it like
this in the future.

>
> --
> t
>

-- 
Mathieu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-samba-maint/attachments/20190916/5aedd5f6/attachment.html>


More information about the Pkg-samba-maint mailing list