[Pkg-samba-maint] updating samba to current upstream

Michael Tokarev mjt at tls.msk.ru
Thu Mar 24 09:10:59 GMT 2022


24.03.2022 11:51, Andrew Bartlett wrote:

> The RFCs are what comes to mind, if the old scripts only remove some
> files by name that might need updating.

Can I assume the drafts are also of this same nature? Samba-4.16 has
whole bunch of stuff in third_party/heimdal/doc/standardisation/ - I
think we can add this directory into gbp.conf's exclude list, together
with existing third_party/heimdal/lib/wind/rfc*.txt (moved).

[..]
>> After looking at all this, I'm somewhat lost here. I didn't expect
>> this to take *this* much work. It is not the work which bothers me,
>> but that I still don't have understanding about which side to attack
>> it all. I have to start with *something* which is manageable more
>> or less short-term.
> 
> Was that a hot potato or a hot grenade I saw passed your way?

Heh. I love this attitude. And I've no idea what did you throw at
me with your "good luck making it DFSG-free" comment ;))

> More seriously, I do thank you for stepping up, new energy has been
> needed in this space for a long time.

I just need it to work. After hitting *major* pain with #1005642 I
realized I should do something with the situation, fixing damaged user
data is much more problematic.

[..]
> I would love to see 4.16 packaged.  That would help everyone as it

Yeah this is definitely a plan Andrew. I was just over-optimistic
after your comment :) And started thinking maybe it's a better
idea to start from some smaller step, thinking the non-DFSG part
in heimdal will be real PITA to deal with :)

Thank you!

/mjt



More information about the Pkg-samba-maint mailing list