libsdl1.2_1.2.15-8_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Felix Geyer]

On 28.10.2013 21:11, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> I am trying to follow the advice given in recent bug reports asking to
> support arm64, doing it first in libsdl1.2 (and I intended libsdl2 as
> well) before going with the modules like mixer. BTW, Reviewing it now,
> I think that I put an error when saying "autotools-dev" instead of
> using underscore, as recommended in the bug reports (like #727964).
> 
> I actually tried to not use autogen.sh but I got the error below, so I
> didn't want to also start to dig into that and though that continuing
> with autogen.sh for the time being was fine (especially for the 1.2
> branches).
> 
> If you have a good solution for this, I can work into applying the
> solution for all packages, different branches and modules (it will be
> easier to maintain things if all modules work in the same way and the
> Debian package is homogeneous, I think).
> 
> If you don't know or don't have time, I will try to review all this
> more closely and see if I can get it working properly (I have a window
> of about a week with more time than usual to work in Debian stuff, but
> with patchy internet access).

I don't have a better solution for libsdl1.2. Hopefully for SDL2 regenerating
the autoconf foo doesn't pose any problems.

One thing we could try for 1.2 is to not regenerate the step that fails.
Something like AUTOCONF=true dh_autoreconf or AUTOMAKE=true dh_autoreconf.

Cheers,
Felix