libsdl1.2_1.2.15-8_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo]

2013/10/29 Felix Geyer <fgeyer at debian.org>:
> On 28.10.2013 21:11, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> I am trying to follow the advice given in recent bug reports asking to
>> support arm64, doing it first in libsdl1.2 (and I intended libsdl2 as
>> well) before going with the modules like mixer. BTW, Reviewing it now,
>> I think that I put an error when saying "autotools-dev" instead of
>> using underscore, as recommended in the bug reports (like #727964).
>>
>> I actually tried to not use autogen.sh but I got the error below, so I
>> didn't want to also start to dig into that and though that continuing
>> with autogen.sh for the time being was fine (especially for the 1.2
>> branches).
>>
>> If you have a good solution for this, I can work into applying the
>> solution for all packages, different branches and modules (it will be
>> easier to maintain things if all modules work in the same way and the
>> Debian package is homogeneous, I think).
>>
>> If you don't know or don't have time, I will try to review all this
>> more closely and see if I can get it working properly (I have a window
>> of about a week with more time than usual to work in Debian stuff, but
>> with patchy internet access).
>
> I don't have a better solution for libsdl1.2. Hopefully for SDL2 regenerating
> the autoconf foo doesn't pose any problems.
>
> One thing we could try for 1.2 is to not regenerate the step that fails.
> Something like AUTOCONF=true dh_autoreconf or AUTOMAKE=true dh_autoreconf.

I just uploaded the fixes copied from libsdl2-image to libsdl2-net,
and uploaded sdl-sound1.2 yesterday (which is different from the other
modules, hosted by Ryan icculus Gordon).  I will try to get the same
fix for libsdl2-{mixer,ttf} next.

Let's see how it goes, and then will look into the 1.2 modules.


Cheers.
-- 
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo at gmail.com>