sdlgfx 2.0.25

[Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo]

Sorry, I already sent a review in other e-mail.


2014/1/14 Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco at yahoo.it>:
> X: sdl2gfx source: deprecated-configure-filename
>
>
> should be repoted upstream, right?

If you do it, it would be great.


> N: Processing binary package libsdl2-gfx-1.0-0 (version 1.0.0-1, arch amd64) ...
> W: libsdl2-gfx-1.0-0: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
> N: ----
> N: Processing binary package libsdl2-gfx-dev (version 1.0.0-1, arch amd64) ...
> W: libsdl2-gfx-dev: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
> N: ----
> N: Processing binary package libsdl2-gfx-doc (version 1.0.0-1, arch all) ...
> W: libsdl2-gfx-doc: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
>
>
> I don't care too much, should we open an itp bug?

You already did... but yes, even if not critical, it's a good idea aI
think and we did it with the rest.


> W: libsdl2-gfx-doc: embedded-javascript-library usr/share/doc/libsdl2-gfx-doc/jquery.js
>
>
> I saw this warning in some other packages, should we symlink jquery?

That is what the tag recommends, yes.  They have usually good info in
the website:

  http://lintian.debian.org/tags/embedded-javascript-library.html

You can also use this tag for lintian command line to see the same
text as in the website:

    -i, --info                give detailed info about tags


> I: libsdl2-gfx-doc: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration
>
> I'm not sure about how to fix this lintian "error"

Same as above, see the recomendation (I don't have it in the top of my
head).  If you have doubts after looking ask again, maybe I can find
something.


> Thanks, Hope the work is almost done!

Yeah, it is, thanks for your work :-)


Cheers.
--
Manuel