Bug#139815: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#139815: Are useradd.local/userdel.local still relevant?

[Martin Quinson]

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 08:14:05PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> In #139815, the bug submitter mentions:
>=20
> I think it would be betteter to use run-parts for user{add,del}.local. So
> the installed packages could install their own files.
> If you are interested, I can make a patch for you. When you say yes, plea=
se
> give me a hint where to store them. I think they should be somewhere in /=
etc.
> But where?
>=20
> Howevr, to my knowledge useradd.local is not used (anymore?) and I see
> no reference to this file anywhere.
>=20
> Tomasz and others, do you think that this bug can be closed because no
> more relevant?

Grepping around on "local" doesn't seem to give any sensible result. I also
vote for closing it.

Mt.

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCiQm3IiC/MeFF8zQRAjvgAJ9diX2NjJhAGKUz0y6Jm3cZS8Z7oACfUs0X
RTPM2W14uLLtcOm1kt2o6cA=
=W1iV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--