Shibboleth and OpenSSL 1.1

[Ferenc Wágner]

"Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 at osu.edu> writes:

>> Many thanks for the overview, Scott.  If I understand you right,
>> Santuario is only the tip of the iceberg: XMLTooling, OpenSAML and the
>> SP use the structure fields exposed by OpenSSL 1.0 to do their job, and
>> it isn't yet clear whether 1.1 provides the necessary interface at all.
>
> I think Rod already has it all building so he believes the work is
> mostly done. But that still leaves a lot of testing and getting
> Santuario dealt with.

On a second look, OpenSAML2 and the SP don't include the OpenSSL headers
directly.  Don't Santuario and XMLTooling provide enough abstraction to
eliminate churn on these higher levels?
-- 
Thanks,
Feri