stretch-backports of 2.6.1

Ferenc Wágner wferi at
Wed Dec 6 19:14:44 UTC 2017

Etienne Dysli-Metref <etienne.dysli-metref at> writes:

> On 06/12/17 16:38, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>> Is getting xerces up to 3.2 an option (or was that already done)?
> xerces-c 3.2.0 landed in testing about two weeks ago [1] so I could
> backport it to stable (no idea how difficult that is though).

Scott, why are you interested in this?  Backporting Xerces 3.2 to stable
would be possible, but is this really necessary?

> Neither xml-security-c nor xmltooling currently specify a version
> constraint on their build-dependency on libxerces-c-dev. I can't tell
> whether they have been rebuild against 3.2 in testing.

The 2.6 uploads were done after the Xerces transition started, so yes:

More information about the Pkg-shibboleth-devel mailing list