Transitioning to SP3
Etienne Dysli Metref
etienne.dysli-metref at switch.ch
Mon Jul 30 07:12:33 BST 2018
On 28/07/18 15:40, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> 1. Some current package (and repository) names contain version numbers:
> opensaml2, shibboleth-sp2 and their binaries. Shall we
> a) drop the number,
> b) bump it to 3, or
> c) leave it alone?
> Option a) seems the cleanest but brings in transitional packages,
> option c) does not require any extra work but brings in confusion.
I would favour cleaning up the names with option a). Option b) would
require transitional packages as well wouldn't it?
> 2. Given that the stack has already been removed from testing, do we
> have to perform a formal transition and stage in experimental, or is
> it okay to upload the new versions to unstable one after the other?
I don't feel familiar enough with "the Debian way" to answer that.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Pkg-shibboleth-devel