[Pkg-systemd-maintainers] Bug#739699: Bug#739699: Set capabilities for systemd-detect-virt
Tollef Fog Heen
tfheen at err.no
Sat Mar 1 17:19:41 GMT 2014
]] Michael Stapelberg
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Biebl <biebl at debian.org> writes:
> >> Sounds reasonable. I pushed
> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-systemd/systemd.git;a=commitdiff;h=73b71c7fc5102b9749e1fd2811c2c5540aee8d39
> >
> > Tollef, are you ok with having a hard dep on libcap2-bin in systemd?
> > I'm still a bit undecided myself.
> Consider the list of reverse dependencies, specifically
> iputils-ping (!):
Hmm, seems like it should have its priority raised, then. It's optional
and iputils-ping is important.
> Therefore, I don’t think this is a big deal, even on servers and
> possibly embedded systems (presumably embedded folks rebuild the package
> anyway to strip documentation, for example).
>
> If we want to avoid the dependency, we could Recommend libcap2-bin and
> conditionally run the code in postinst, though.
I'd rather not do this, since we should then also have a trigger that
fires when libcap2-bin is installed, which just begs for things to go
wrong.
I say we just depend on libcap2-bin (and possibly file a bug to get its
priority raised).
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
More information about the Pkg-systemd-maintainers
mailing list