Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Michael Biebl <biebl at debian.org> [2014-10-07 14:36 +0200]:
> No, it's a misunderstanding. You would have to opt-in for the
> warning message to go away. systemd-networkd expects the new
> naming policy to be active (because that's the upstream default).
> If it's not, it assumes you have disabled it via the kernel
> command line.

So systemd-networkd is a requirement now and gets enabled on all
systems that run systemd?

And the warning is there to remind the admin that s/he has to make
changes now to accomodate the new, uninvited guest?

What's the rationale here?

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at d.o> @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"you raise the blade, you make the change
 you rearrange me till i'm sane.
 you lock the door, and throw away the key,
 there's someone in my head but it's not me."
                                                   -- pink floyd, 1972
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1107 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20141007/bc17709e/attachment-0002.sig>