Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

[Michael Biebl]

Am 07.10.2014 um 14:48 schrieb martin f krafft:
> also sprach Michael Biebl <biebl at debian.org> [2014-10-07 14:36 +0200]:
>> No, it's a misunderstanding. You would have to opt-in for the
>> warning message to go away. systemd-networkd expects the new
>> naming policy to be active (because that's the upstream default).
>> If it's not, it assumes you have disabled it via the kernel
>> command line.
> 
> So systemd-networkd is a requirement now and gets enabled on all
> systems that run systemd?

No it is not enabled by default. Fwiw, you can trivially easily check
that yourself. (systemctl status and systemctl is-enabled is your friend).

> And the warning is there to remind the admin that s/he has to make
> changes now to accomodate the new, uninvited guest?

It warns you, that the default systemd-networkd configuration makes use
of the new interface naming, but that it is not enabled.

Keep in mind, that this message is logged by systemd-udevd, not
systemd-networkd itself. So you get that irregardless whether
systemd-networkd is enabled/active or not.


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20141007/d0379afb/attachment-0002.sig>