Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Michael Biebl <biebl at debian.org> [2014-10-07 15:12 +0200]:
> No it is not enabled by default. Fwiw, you can trivially easily check
> that yourself. (systemctl status and systemctl is-enabled is your friend).

Thank you for the hint.

> > And the warning is there to remind the admin that s/he has to
> > make changes now to accomodate the new, uninvited guest?
> 
> It warns you, that the default systemd-networkd configuration
> makes use of the new interface naming, but that it is not enabled.
> Keep in mind, that this message is logged by systemd-udevd, not
> systemd-networkd itself. So you get that irregardless whether
> systemd-networkd is enabled/active or not.

What is the rationale for this choice? Why did you guys decide it
was best to log a warning every few seconds and require the admin to
take action to restore the old behaviour?

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at d.o> @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
chaos reigns within.
reflect, repent, reboot.
order shall return.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1107 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20141007/3bd69b8d/attachment-0002.sig>