systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump)

[Felipe Sateler]

On 7 October 2015 at 09:31, Michael Biebl <biebl at debian.org> wrote:
> Afaics, that's about 200K. So yeah, I could live with having those
> shipped in the systemd package.
>
>  and bootctl is useful on its
>> own, even for people not using systemd-boot (it shows the
>> boot configuration).
>
>> You could keep that in the systemd package itself, and still
>> run bootctl update in systemd's postinst script, as that does
>> no harm, it only updates existing bootloader copies in the
>> ESP (unfortunately, only one, with a fixed path, instead of
>> supporting all non-removable ESPs).
>
> I mentioned splitting of systemd-boot since that is what I recalled when
> we spoke about that at debconf. You mentioned some additional scripts
> you wrote for gummiboot and that those should not be shipped in the
> systemd binary package.

200k here and there end up adding up. Was there talk about splitting
up the existing systemd package up so that minimal images can be
(more) minimal?
In particular, I'm thinking about stuff not needed on containers, so
that the base system image size can be minimized.


-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler