systemd-boot (Re: PR: fsateler/coredump)

[Felipe Sateler]

On 8 October 2015 at 12:50, Michael Biebl <biebl at debian.org> wrote:
> Am 08.10.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Julian Andres Klode:
>> I'm wondering if it makes sense to have some sort of systemd
>> meta package. I recently wondered very long where machinectl
>> was when I wanted to try machinectl shell...
>
> We added machinectl to the package description, so it should turn up
> when running apt-cache search machinectl. We tried to do that for the
> other split off package, systemd-journal-remote, as well.
>
>> Or have a systemd-core package containing only what's needed
>> to bring up a system, and make the systemd package larger.
>
> We discussed that at debconf, making systemd a meta-package depending on
> all sub-packages.
>
> This would have meant shuffling around a lot of conffiles and we were
> worried a bit about the upgrade path, so we decided against it back then.

Nod. Although there will have to be shuffling around of at least all
the dbus policies, no?

-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler