Bug#922082: src:systemd: please package a minimal build of systemd-socket-activate separately

Daniel Kahn Gillmor dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Thu Feb 14 22:44:31 GMT 2019

On Tue 2019-02-12 09:10:57 +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> Maybe a separate implementation (like opentmpfiles for tmpfiles) would
> be a better approach?

Yep, i see your point.  I've now filed https://bugs.debian.org/922353 --
an ITP of a simple python3 implementation of the sd_listen_fds(3)
convention that should provide something similar, so i'm closing this
bug report.

I welcome feedback on the "socket-activate" implementation from anyone
interested in encouraging more widespread development of simple,
socket-activated services.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-systemd-maintainers/attachments/20190214/9decbbdf/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list