[Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#594917: The future of non-dependency-based boot
Roger Leigh
rleigh at codelibre.net
Thu Apr 19 13:26:41 UTC 2012
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:52:23PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Roger Leigh
>
> > (I don't know if you saw my mail regarding having done this
> > provisionally in git; I mentioned it on the pkg-sysvinit-devel
> > list and in #545976. I was wanting to additionally ask you
> > how safe it would be to remove the is_unsafe_to_activate check
> > and just run insserv anyway, and rely on insserv to fail if
> > problems are found.)
>
> Not having sysv-rc complain when it can't wrap its head around the init
> scripts on the system would be very much appreciated. I'm kinda tired
> of it trying to convert my system on each upgrade and then failing.
> (And this machine has never even used sysvinit.)
Could you provide examples please? If there are init scripts which
it can't handle, that's a bug. Either in insserv or (more likely)
the scripts.
This has been partly discussed in #594917, but you haven't
followed up there in response to the last comment.
Based on this bug, I think it's perfectly reasonable for sysv-rc
to manage the links; whether sysvinit is or is not running is not
part of the question here, IMO. Given that systemd users are for
the most part going to be users migrating from a sysvinit/sysv-rc/
insserv configuration, it's not unexpected that insserv will be
managing the links. systemd should be able to cope with
insserv managing the links shouldn't it?
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
`- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800
More information about the Pkg-sysvinit-devel
mailing list