[Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#810018: Additional info possibly relevant for procps-base/pidof ...

[Craig Small]

On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 19:38 Simon McVittie <smcv at debian.org> wrote:

> If we want pidof to be provided by a new procps-base instead of
> sysvinit-utils for buster, maybe now is the time to start uploading
> packages with that change to experimental?
>
I'd say if it is going to happen, it should happen now.


> This appears to have been fixed before procps 3.3.12 (which is in stretch)
> if I'm reading changelogs correctly?
>
This was the revert of the namespace problem?

 - Craig

-- 
Craig Small             https://dropbear.xyz/     csmall at : dropbear.xyz
Debian GNU/Linux        https://www.debian.org/   csmall at : debian.org
Mastodon: @smallsees at social.dropbear.xyz             Twitter: @smallsees
GPG fingerprint:      5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2  0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/attachments/20180709/e7513ff4/attachment.html>