[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#825191: Clarify libdwarf vs libdw build dependencies for flatpak

[Joaquim Rocha]

BTW, Alex has released 0.6.2. Will you have packages soon? (so I hold on
the Endless's ones for a little while)

Joaquim Rocha  |  +49.151.661.20299  |  Endless

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Joaquim Rocha <jrocha at endlessm.com> wrote:

> Great! Thank you!
>
> Joaquim Rocha  |  +49.151.661.20299  |  Endless
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Simon McVittie <smcv at debian.org> wrote:
>
>> Control: tags -1 pending
>>
>> On Tue, 24 May 2016 at 15:02:04 +0200, Joaquim Rocha wrote:
>> > Building Flatpak depends on libdwarf-dev currently but Flatpak uses
>> only the
>> > dwarf.h header which is also provided by libdw-dev.
>>
>> ... and they conflict. All else being equal, we should probably
>> build-depend
>> on whichever is more popular :-)
>>
>> In unstable, only hhvm build-depends on libdwarf-dev, whereas lots of
>> stuff (linux, rpm, systemd, ...) build-depends on libdw-dev, so libdw-dev
>> wins the popularity contest and should probably be used.
>>
>> Also, libdw-dev comes from src:elfutils, which we already build-depend on
>> for libelf-dev.
>>
>> Fixed in git, thanks.
>>
>> Regards,
>>     S
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-utopia-maintainers/attachments/20160524/66c3b02c/attachment.html>