[Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#825191: Clarify libdwarf vs libdw build dependencies for flatpak

[Joaquim Rocha]

Great! Thank you!

Joaquim Rocha  |  +49.151.661.20299  |  Endless

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Simon McVittie <smcv at debian.org> wrote:

> Control: tags -1 pending
>
> On Tue, 24 May 2016 at 15:02:04 +0200, Joaquim Rocha wrote:
> > Building Flatpak depends on libdwarf-dev currently but Flatpak uses only
> the
> > dwarf.h header which is also provided by libdw-dev.
>
> ... and they conflict. All else being equal, we should probably
> build-depend
> on whichever is more popular :-)
>
> In unstable, only hhvm build-depends on libdwarf-dev, whereas lots of
> stuff (linux, rpm, systemd, ...) build-depends on libdw-dev, so libdw-dev
> wins the popularity contest and should probably be used.
>
> Also, libdw-dev comes from src:elfutils, which we already build-depend on
> for libelf-dev.
>
> Fixed in git, thanks.
>
> Regards,
>     S
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-utopia-maintainers/attachments/20160524/05240efc/attachment.html>