AMP packages

[Kilian Krause]

--=-Og0ZT0DXpcdfaMKttRlS
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Tzafrir,


> > I'm not sure if "amp", "amportal"
> > or "asterisk-amp" should be chosen. Somewhat i think that "amp"
> > soundplayer from woody can be exchanged with this new AMP for it's
> > neither in sarge nor in sid. We should however bring up this issue to
> > ftpmasters. Could you please open an ITP and then post a question
> > whether to package this as amp or amportal to debian-devel?
>=20
> OK, I will.

ok, great. Thanks! ;)

> >=20
> > Does upstream offer alternatives?
> > Still, I'm not all against flash, as there's more to the world than
> > Linux and Debian (and especially softphones might be running on Windows
> > PCs). Thus if we can support it, that'd be a good start, but working
> > with upstream for a free client should be started at least. (and off th=
e
> > record, NEW isn't moving anyway,=20
>=20
> NEW =3D=3D ?

When you upload a package to the archive that has no version in the
archive yet, it's moved to the NEW queue. From there ftpmasters have to
accept it into the official archive. Currently this queue is quite long
(you can check it at http://qa.debian.org/~anibal/debian-NEW.html), so
if we'd be uploading AMP, then we'd end up in there as are
asterisk-spandsp-fax and yate (just to name some examples).

--=20
Best regards,
 Kilian

--=-Og0ZT0DXpcdfaMKttRlS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCEJT8vdkzt4X+wX8RAiD5AJ45K1s9qoeLl6VZizEqlBPF14VzAQCdEXxs
1THiKhQjsksTaYhmKOFyLEU=
=nKlK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Og0ZT0DXpcdfaMKttRlS--