Experienced problems with asterisk and x-lite ?

[Nestor A. Diaz L.]

Thanks Kilian, what i think i am going to do is to download the lastest
CVS head for h323, and see if it works for me on 1.0.2 or not. i will tell
you about this.

Please send me the link for the latest asterisk to test it.

Thanks.

--
Nestor A. Diaz
Ingeniero de Sistemas y Comp.
Tel. +57 1 6005490 x 211
Cel. +57 315 8190760
nestor@tiendalinux.com
http://www.tiendalinux.com
Bogota, Colombia

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Kilian Krause wrote:

> Hi Nestor,
> 
> Am Samstag, den 22.01.2005, 09:33 -0500 schrieb Nestor A. Diaz L.:
> > Thanks, i finally download the scources from sid and compile and now
> > everything works ok with the same configuration, i also updated all the
> > dependencias to the latest debian sarge.
> > 
> > The only problem i have for now, is that i want to set up h323 too, but it
> > doesn't work, the connection is done but no audio is transmited, the
> > documentation specifically states that we need a specific h323 library:
> > 
> > "This code runs on Open H.323 v1.12.2 and PWLib v1.5.2. If you use
> > different versions, you are on your own. See the Makefile for more
> > details."
> > 
> > is there any libopenh323-1.12.2 debian package arround for download ? to
> > compile against with asterisk ?
> 
> you can try snapshot.debian.net for that old version. However I strongy
> advise to use neweer version. For the old one had security flawes IIRC.
> We're just in the progress of prepareing an asterisk 1.0.4 upload with
> asterisk-oh323 that should address this problem.
> If you're willing to testdrive new packages and provide feedback i can
> offer you a download link.
> 
> > Have you made this asterisk version works with h323 compiled against
> > libopenh323-1.13.2 ? is audio transmited ?
> 
> H323 has always been an issue. It has been severely broken ever since.
> Check the bug reports at bugs.debian.org/asterisk fro details if you
> like. Problem with upstream is that they reckon it's only due to the
> different version (and on the other hand, that stable chan_h323 would be
> obsolete anyway). We're considering using the CVS HEAD chan_h323 which
> is said to be better, but I don't feel very comfortable doing that.
> 
> In case you have feedback about chan_h323 CVS HEAD for 1.0.4, please do
> mail me.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
>  Kilian
>