asterisk dapper.2114_to_dapper.2234 diff

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 10:30:30PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Sunday 06 August 2006 15:31, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > 'make install' of asterisk is not trivial. It even generates at least
> > one configuration file. Reimplementing it with dh_install and
> > debain/rules is also sub-optimal.
> 
> Actually `make install` doesn't have to generate a demo configuration file.
> 
> $(MAKE) samples is used to generate the demo configuration files, we don't to 
> generate those, nor ship them in the final product, rather just in the demo 
> config programme.
> 
> Perhaps we should have:
> 
> asterisk-config-demo
> asterisk-config-minimum

The demo is easy to disable, and provides a "functioing" (answering)
PBX.

What exactly do you want from the default configuration that is not
provided by it? What would there be in the "minimal" configuration?

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen         sip:tzafrir at local.xorcom.com
icq#16849755          iax:tzafrir at local.xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406          jabber:tzafrir at jabber.org
tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com     http://www.xorcom.com