sofia-sip 1.12.4-2 ready for upload, Closes: #404008

[George Danchev]

On Saturday 23 December 2006 18:34, George Danchev wrote:
> On Saturday 23 December 2006 17:38, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > George,
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 04:56:38PM +0200, George Danchev wrote:
> > > Hey guys,
> > > 	sofia-sip 1.12.4-2 ready for upload [1]. The revision closes serious
> > > bug #404008. Please review svn rev 2837 and upload. Thanks for your
> > > time!
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] sofia-sip (1.12.4-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> > >
> > >   * NOT RELEASED YET
> > >   [ Kai Vehmanen ]
> > >   * Do not install addrinfo binary and man page. (Closes: #404008).
> > >     Next upstream release will contain a renamed binary that can
> > >     be added back to the package.
> > >   * Fixed problem with running top-level doxygen target twice
> >
> > this doyxgen issue is still unfixed, no?
>
> Oops, is it not fixed yet, if it really needs to be fixed at all.
> I saw the revert shot at:
>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-commits/2006-December/001
>958.html
>
> but I missed to remove the entry of:
>
> "* Fixed problem with running top-level doxygen target twice"
> from the changelog.
>
> Since we are in a freeze before release and it is not yet know if
> doxygen-run-twice issue is:
> * a normal behaviour or
> * a CDBS issue or
> * our own bug
>
> I'd suggest to fix the RC-part (#404008) only with that upload.

Oops2, I changed my mind now. Since Rémi Denis-Courmont [1] uploaded 
ndisc6 (0.7.3-2) to unstable with conflicting files removed from his package, 
i.e. #404007 is now resolved, but #404008 downgraded to important (just for 
our own future references) I think it is best to keep shipping addrinfo 
binary and manpage with the sofia-sip-bin package as it is currently in Sid 
and Etch. We will have these binaries and manpages prefixed with a proper 
sofia-sip-specific namespace in the future upstream versions of the library 
(so that they might evovle on their own), which names are still to be decided 
upstream. Of course this will be post-etch. So, the best reaction for 
sofia-sip in etch, would be no reaction at all for the time being ;-) What do 
you guys think ?

[1] buglogs:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=404007
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=404008

-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB