Updated radiusclient-ng

[Jan Janak]

Mark,

Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Monday 20 February 2006 00:02, Jan Janak wrote:
>> I started polishing of SER related packages so that they could be
>> integrated into Debian.
> 
> Thanks Jan,
> 
> I am keen to get these included in pkg-voip-maintainers.
> 
> Do you have an account on alioth?  If so the you can inject the debian/ 
> component directly using svn..

  I just created one, so I will try to inject the packages there.

>> The source package can be downloaded from:
>>
>> http://apt.sip-router.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/source/radiusclient-ng
>> _0.5.2-0.2.dsc
>> http://apt.sip-router.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/source/radiusclient-ng
>> _0.5.2.orig.tar.gz
>> http://apt.sip-router.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/source/radiusclient-ng
>> _0.5.2-0.2.diff.gz
> 
> It would appear you are using a different .orig.tar.gz file as the md5 sum 
> didn't match the .dsc and the diff wouldn't apply cleanly.
> 
> Can you upload some new packages.

  Fixed, please, try again (The file was not complete for some reason).

>> There is a couple of things I am not sure about:
>>
>> - debian/rules runs aclocal, automake, autoconf at the beginning. Is this
>>   correct ?
> 
> Generally that isn't desired behaviour.  If you package has a configure script 
> you shouldn't need to run the libtool's unless you need to repackage.  I 
> would remove those from the debian/rules, provided it does run correctly.

  OK, I'll do that.

>> - How should the package depend on autotools-dev, on a particular version
>> or just autotools-dev ? (I read the corresponding parts of debian new
>> maintainer guide but it is still not clear to me as it offers several
>> alternatives)
> 
> Generally the package shouldn't depend on autotools-dev, for the reason I 
> stated above.

  OK.

     Jan.