sync'ed packages of spandsp

[Caio Begotti]

On Tuesday 21 February 2006 13:51, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Indeed. The CDBS is usually rather source of bad packaging than help and
> simplification. That's why I imported the good parts but left CDBS out.

What about the KDE, GNOME, Perl and Python teams using it in a lot of 
packages? Actually, more packages than I thought already use CDBS: 
http://caio.ueberalles.net/cdbs-reference/

Killian, if I'm all to mantain SpanDSP packages, why couldn't I use CDBS 
anyway? I've working on these packages for a long time and would like to get 
them if everybody doesn't have anything against it.

I don't know the procedures to adopt some package (SpanDSP wasn't updated for 
almost 1 year, IIRC) while not being DD but, anyway... I took a look at some 
of pkg-voip packages to convert them to CDBS a few weeks ago. Should I just 
to give up then?

Regards,

-- 
Caio Begotti, http://caio.ueberalles.net

B. Shaw  "Take care to get what you like
or you will be forced to like what you get"