sync'ed packages of spandsp

[Simon Richter]

Hi,

Caio Begotti wrote:

> Killian, if I'm all to mantain SpanDSP packages, why couldn't I use CDBS 
> anyway? I've working on these packages for a long time and would like to get 
> them if everybody doesn't have anything against it.

The big problem with cdbs is that the resulting rules file is no longer 
imperative, and thus very hard to understand as rules are pulled 
together from a number of files; in the specific case of spandsp, it 
would also be desirable to build different variants for different 
subarchitectures (armv5's "clz" instruction springs to mind here, using 
it would reduce CPU load by a factor of 3), and cdbs AFAIK does not 
handle that.

> I don't know the procedures to adopt some package (SpanDSP wasn't updated for 
> almost 1 year, IIRC)

And why should it? The fax protocols have not changed since. The only 
thing left to do is optimisations.

    Simon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20060223/caa73a87/signature.pgp