Bug#278772: Bug#329251: New asterisk-chan-capi version

[Kilian Krause]

Hi Lionel,

Am Mittwoch, den 11.01.2006, 20:42 +0100 schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 08:24:08PM +0100, Kilian Krause wrote:
> 
> > as you seem to have a box with asterisk 1.2.1 and CAPI at hand, would
> > you mind giving my new packs a try before I'll upload them?
> > You'll find them at http://backend.verfaction.de/~kk/deb_upload/
> 
> Sure; note that my asterisk setup isn't complete yet, so in the
> immediate I can try out only the very basic features.

excellent!

> > They should fix all open bugs but the one supposed to add the
> > postinst part. You got any proposal for that?
> 
> I didn't touch my /etc/asterisk/modules.conf and chan_capi got loaded
> automatically. Possibly that's a new (mis?)feature of Asterisk 1.2? So
> as far as _I_ know, we don't have to do anything in this regard in the
> postinst.

mmh, might be part of the problems we have seen reported against
asterisk. Maybe this is only new since 1.2, not sure. Yet we should make
sure installing chan-capi without CAPI running on your system does not
break the asterisk installation then. Can you do that? Else we might
need to add a noload line.

> For my education: Why do we create the asterisk user in the postinst
> of asterisk-chan-capi? The asterisk package itself takes care of it,
> doesn't it?

Yes, that should be used. It might be due to some historical postinst
problems configuring asterisk-chan-capi before asterisk, but off the bat
I don't recall for sure. Thus most probably it can be safely deleted.

-- 
Best regards,
 Kilian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20060111/fd45edf5/attachment-0003.pgp